liveleak new zealand christchurch reddit video

The British Medical Association describes vicarious trauma as 'the process of change resulting from empathetic engagement with trauma survivors.' It notes that 'anyone who engages empathetically with survivors of traumatic incidents, torture, and material relating to their trauma, is potentially affected, including doctors and other health professionals.' This isn't to say a single viewing of the footage will irreparably scar you-in fact, it's repeated exposure that carries the worst of the risk-but it will be, at the very least, far more unsettling than you probably bargained for.

Every time you feel your heartbeat accelerating during a tense scene in a thriller, or jump when a dark figure rushes the screen, you're having a vicarious experience-and it can be as impactful as anything you are a part of, in real life. Huge swathes of culture-especially visual culture-is premised on our ability to viscerally experience violence indirectly.

Thirdly, and as importantly, just because you're not at the scene and not in any immediate risk, this does not mean that you will not be affected. By looking through the killer's helmet camera, you are adopting his gaze, and actively participating in this indignity.

If you want to know more about the victims, wait for their life stories to emerge. He was determined to humiliate them, to make them look like targets in a video game. Tarrant not only brutally brought this moment forward for dozens of innocent people, who had so many more years to live and so much more than him to give to their families, communities and to the country they made their home. Secondly, it is difficult to imagine a more intimate moment in any person's life than dying. There's plenty to be said for simply declining to oblige their desire for notoriety. Whatever false modesty Tarrant might profess in the tedious manifesto ascribed to him, a quality shared universally by terrorists of all ilk is the desire to stand out from the crowd, to be seen-if only by themselves-as heroes and possibly martyrs. The very fact terrorists exploit people's interest in dramatic events should caution you against typing in that search string, and certainly against sharing it with others.įirstly, by doing so you'd be playing up to the narcissism of someone who couldn't come up with any more adequate way to generate renown than to massacre innocent people. (I'm looking at you, Google and YouTube-not to mention Facebook, which hosted the live stream to begin with.) And you don't even need to be on 8chan to stumble on the footage: Search engines' predictive search will actively encourage you to browse for it when you type a related term. You don't need to be an 8chan denizen to be tempted by firsthand footage of an event dominating the news cycle, just as most people probably wouldn't look away if they came by the scene of an attack-or even a particularly bad accident-in real life. A small minority of us might be scanning the footage in desperate hope to establish the whereabouts of our loved ones.īut plenty of people are today looking at the Christchurch video for no real good reason-just because the draw of the drama and the apparent safety of viewing it from miles away, behind a computer screen. Some of us, like journalists and police, are professionally obliged to view distressing imagery to try to discern valuable new information, whether for investigation purposes or to better inform debate. Dozens of copies of what appears to be footage from a helmet-mounted camera are circulating on the darker corners of the internet and are being persistently posted on more mainstream platforms such as YouTube, Twitter and Facebook, which don't always manage to catch the video before it goes up.

Horrific videos like the one posted by the Christchurch mosque shooting suspect Brenton Tarrant are geared to appeal to the morbidly curious, and appeal it did.

Liveleak new zealand christchurch reddit video